My husband Pete and I joined with many LGBT folks and straight allies in celebrating the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling declaring Section 3 of the inappropriately-named Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional. We were also happy SCOTUS deferred to a lower court ruling on Prop 8 based on the standing of those who challenged Judge Vaughn Walker’s decision.
Pete and I will now be able to file all of our
income tax forms together, no longer lying on our federal return by saying we
are single. We’re covered by inheritance rights heterosexual couples have
always enjoyed. If something happens to me, Pete will get my Social Security
benefits. If I lose my job, Pete will be covered under whatever meager health
benefits we get from COBRA. And we can exchange money between various checking
and savings accounts without worrying about exceeding the “gift” amount of
$13,000 a year. While we were both born in the U.S., it’s also heartening to see
bi-national couples finally able to get a green card for the non-American spouse. Those and more than 1,100 other federal rights have been extended to us and all legally married gay and lesbian couples, catching up to the equal rights we enjoy under New York State law.
Aye, there’s the rub. We’re fine as long as we
remain in New York. We can’t consider employment in Florida or a home in North Carolina.
If we visit my brother in Texas and one of us were to end up in a hospital, the
other half of our legally-sanctioned marriage has no right to determine
treatment and can be barred from visiting the injured party. That’s because Section 2 of DOMA remains and we are only legally married if we remain contained in the pen of 13
states that recognize the validity of our union. That section of DOMA was not
part of the Windsor case on which the Court made its ruling.
There are still 37 states where we are not equal.
There are 29 states where we can be fired for even the suspicion of being gay –
though I’m sure our wedding rings would give us away. That’s one state less
that the two-thirds needed to pass a constitutional amendment that would
effectively strip us of our marriage. So, Rep. Tim Huelskamp’s threat to introduce a “Federal Marriage Amendment” is nothing more than street theater,
since it will never pass. I found it rather funny that his speech to propose
the amendment, delivered in front of the Supreme Court building, was drowned out by
the successful litigants of the Prop 8 case and their attorneys as the
descended the steps behind him. God proves yet again S/He has a sense of
justice.
Yet, it wasn’t a week of all wins in the fight for
equality. The previous day, by the same 5-4 vote that awarded some semblance of
equality to gay and lesbian couples, SCOTUS gutted the Voting Rights Act of 1965. States that attempted to put restrictions on voting, only to have them
thrown out in court, rejoiced. Texas’ Attorney General said he would move
quickly to institute a Voter ID law. Other states have limited voter registration
periods, early balloting opportunities, or Election Day voting hours. Rather
than encouraging a right that many Americans hold sacred and bemoan low
turnout, some states in the north and south are doing their best to suppress
access to the that right. I feel the need to point out these are being done in
states with Republicans in power. Growing up as a Caucasian family in a predominantly African-American neighborhood, we learned a lesson on race at a very early age. My father told me when I was five or six that if my friend Kenny and I got “boo-boos,” we’d both bleed the same color blood. I never forgot that. I also never heard either of my parents utter a discriminatory word, phrase or epithet. My mom and I attended the 15th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s March on Washington in 1978, going to D.C. with our neighbors; we were the only Caucasians on the bus. I went to public schools and a community college where my classmates ranged in age from 17 to 72 and there was a mixture of races, ethnicities and religions (or no religion at all). It’s why I feel comfortable in any group, except in those that espouse hatred in any form. Sadly, there are many such groups still around. Some of them even have representation in Congress. While I agree with one point made by the SCOTUS majority – areas under federal watch need to be expanded – I don’t expect Congress, the House in particular, to be up to the challenge.
As we end Pride Month, we still should celebrate the progress that has been made, while committing ourselves to the fight for equality and winning the struggles that remain.
One last thing…there are several websites that help
LGBT couples navigate the confusing road to semi-equality. Lambda Legal has a good round-up. It’s time for Pete
and me to have a will, health-care proxy and all of the other legal paperwork
that protects us, even though there is a question as to whether other states
would honor it.
No comments:
Post a Comment